We all remember the famous iTunes review calling David and Tamler "repugnant." (And the T-shirt/mugs are coming soon, we promise!) But what did the reviewer mean by that? Was he calling us "immoral"? Did he actually feel disgust when he listened to the podcast? And if so, was there wisdom in his repugnance--did the feeling offer any moral insight about the podcast's value? How did an emotion that originally evolved for pathogen avoidance get into moralizing business anyway? And why do white people kiss their dogs? Plus, an illuminating two week old discussion about the election, and Tamler finally comes around to defending a Kantian position—“the cart-egorical imperative”
📆 2016-07-20 01:00 / ⌛ 01:36:33
📆 2016-07-05 20:00 / ⌛ 01:39:02
📆 2016-06-22 01:00 / ⌛ 01:08:30
📆 2016-06-08 00:00 / ⌛ 01:24:04
📆 2016-05-25 03:00 / ⌛ 01:20:50