#137 Neurologists as medical actuaries

BrainWaves: A Neurology Podcast

• Episode: #137 Neurologists as medical actuaries
• Website: BrainWaves: A Neurology Podcast
• Feed URL: http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:214831941/sounds.rss
• Duration: 00:26:41
• Published: 2019-04-25 11:00

For patients who survive cardiopulmonary arrest, but do not wake up, neurologists are called to the bedside to prognosticate. And the question of 'How much will this patient recover?' is not unlike 'What is the benefit of aggressive therapy to await possible recovery?' In that way, you might consider neurologists to be the actuaries of hospital medicine. In this week's program, we review the clinical and diagnostic data that neurologists incorporate into their model for outcome prediction following anoxic brain injury.

IF YOU'RE TAKING YOUR NEUROLOGY BOARDS, and not sure how to prepare, check out the 2019 Penn Neurology Board Review Course at https://upenn.cloud-cme.com/default.aspx?P=5&EID=54399. BrainWaves' listeners get $150 off their enrollment fee using the promo code 'WAVES2019'.

Produced by James E. Siegler. Music courtesy of Swelling, Soft and Furious, Rafael Archangel, Lovira, and Dark Room. Sound effects by Mike Koenig and Daniel Simion. BrainWaves' podcasts and online content are intended for medical education only and should not be used for clinical decision making. Be sure to follow us on Twitter @brainwavesaudio for the latest updates to the podcast.

REFERENCES

1. Young GB. Clinical practice. Neurologic prognosis after cardiac arrest. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;361:605-11.
2. Sandroni C, Cariou A, Cavallaro F, Cronberg T, Friberg H, Hoedemaekers C, Horn J, Nolan JP, Rossetti AO and Soar J. Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: an advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Resuscitation. 2014;85:1779-89.
3. Sandroni C and D'Arrigo S. Neurologic Prognostication: Neurologic Examination and Current Guidelines. Semin Neurol. 2017;37:40-47.
4. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, Erlinge D, Gasche Y, Hassager C, Horn J, Hovdenes J, Kjaergaard J, Kuiper M, Pellis T, Stammet P, Wanscher M, Wise MP, Aneman A, Al-Subaie N, Boesgaard S, Bro-Jeppesen J, Brunetti I, Bugge JF, Hingston CD, Juffermans NP, Koopmans M, Kober L, Langorgen J, Lilja G, Moller JE, Rundgren M, Rylander C, Smid O, Werer C, Winkel P, Friberg H and Investigators TTMT. Targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C versus 36 degrees C after cardiac arrest. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;369:2197-206.
5. Seder DB. Management of Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018;24:1732-1752.
6. Booth CM, Boone RH, Tomlinson G and Detsky AS. Is this patient dead, vegetative, or severely neurologically impaired? Assessing outcome for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291:870-9.
7. Callaway CW, Donnino MW, Fink EL, Geocadin RG, Golan E, Kern KB, Leary M, Meurer WJ, Peberdy MA, Thompson TM and Zimmerman JL. Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132:S465-82.
8. Jorgensen EO and Holm S. The natural course of neurological recovery following cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1998;36:111-22.
9. Seder DB, Sunde K, Rubertsson S, Mooney M, Stammet P, Riker RR, Kern KB, Unger B, Cronberg T, Dziodzio J, Nielsen N and International Cardiac Arrest R. Neurologic outcomes and postresuscitation care of patients with myoclonus following cardiac arrest. Critical care medicine. 2015;43:965-72.